|
↙️↙️↙️@2damntrans.bsky.social |
Ngl the fact that Starmer followed up that offer of a meeting with Rowling (so that he could offer her “assurances”) by saying that we “shouldn’t have the right” to use women’s toilets was fucking crushing. I never had particularly high hopes for the guy, but that was a punch to the gut.
4 replies 12 reposts 101 likes
|
Emily 404 Not Found
@emilyatlast.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We do have the right, it's enshrined in law, and he fucking knows that. He'll also be aware that the ludicrous noise about "redefining sex" won't work in legislative or practical terms. So, in a sense, his personal view is irrelevant.
2 replies 0 reposts 10 likes
|
|
↙️↙️↙️
@2damntrans.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I guess I should have known back in 2020 when he refused to sign those trans pledges. He was only my second-preference vote, but I’ll cop to being overly optimistic about his intentions.
2 replies 0 reposts 35 likes
|
Emma □ feet
@scary-lil-emma.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It was worse that he didn't publicly decline to meet internationally recognised hate groups at the behest of she that must not be named. & Of course his appointments of health and education ministers does not bode well.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Rose Schmits
@roseschmits.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And it lost him votes i have the receipts those votes were in the pocket and he fucked it
1 replies 2 reposts 15 likes