AndersOSU.bsky.social's avatar

AndersOSU.bsky.social

@andersosu.bsky.social

They’re *ok* at summarizing. The problem is that they way theyre built they summarize the narrative of the document. Lots of times a lawyer cares about things other than a narrative summary If you’re absolutely sure that the information you’re losing isn’t important—fine—But how often is that true?

1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Daniel Goldman's avatar Daniel Goldman @dgoldman.bsky.social
[ View ]

That's why you use a fine-tuned model that's meant for law... I said "GPTs" I didn't say a specific one. I mean I was rather broad to make it fairly easy to defend the initial point.