|
AndersOSU.bsky.social@andersosu.bsky.social |
Yes, they’re used in eDiscovery. They can be useful. Are they improving things? Well, that sort of remains to be seen But you’re doing a motte and bailey. Your medium post had LLMs finding obscure documents. They can’t do that. That they can do some things doesn’t mean you’re not overhyping it
2 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
|
AndersOSU.bsky.social
@andersosu.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I’m a patent lawyer (with an AI focus). There are a ton of consultants popping up offering AI that “searches” and “summarizes” existing patents. They’re absolute garbage and make my job harder. The tech folks don’t understand what lawyers need and think LLMs are an omnitool.
1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Daniel Goldman
@dgoldman.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What do you mean they can't do that? I use it to do that. I use ChatGPT to find documents in languages that I cannot read. If I needed to really be sure that the translation was correct on found documents, I'd hire a professional translator, but can't translate what isn't found first.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes