Also: the act of reading compresses the act of writing temporally. I mean, we typically read at 200-400 words per minute, but we create at more like 1000-2000 words per day: 5-10 minutes' reading. That hour you spent sweating over a paragraph? Is just 30 seconds to your reader.
Creation, including graphics, music, writing and programming is asymmetrical with consumption. From the point of view of a consumer ignorant of the creative process, that asymmetry trivializes creation. bsky.app/profile/cstr...
I know this wasn't directed to me, but I'd like to interject that I read at pretty much the same speed silently as I do aloud, so there's no way I can read that fast. I think this is why I personally may be going on about language. I like the flow of the sentences and appreciate an author's efforts.
> we typically read at 200-400 wpm
Good hypothetical gods, really? People read at just speaking speed?
Feck. I mean, that explains the rash of video sites, but that means the delta between typical & speedreaders is bigger than I thought.
I do about 1000wpm baseline, IIRC, & 2-3x that at a push.
This is why I read many different authors. I love them all. But their work over months is a long evening of reading.
I used to write technical documents for work. Different. But the same in that it takes more time to write than to read.
I will confess to feeling slightly torn when someone tells me it’s taken them a weekend to read something it’s taken me more than a year of hard work, despair and undiluted rage to write. I mean, I suffer for my art, and so should everyone else.