David Noll 's avatar

David Noll

@david.noll.org

We were talking about this in some of the other replies. The reasoning of Harlow/Trump hinges on the effect of the president's awareness that sensitive discussions could be scrutinized, but as @adambonin.bsky.social points out Roberts introduces that with language referencing criminal prosecution.

1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


David Noll 's avatar David Noll @david.noll.org
[ View ]

imo the decision can't logically be limited notwithstanding the criminal prosecution language, but the court obviously hasn't decided the question yet.

1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes