Daniel Roberts's avatar

Daniel Roberts

@drobertsimg.bsky.social

The idea of not looking to motive isntithetical to the most basic principles of criminal law, which require both an actus reus (act) and a mens rea (state of mind) to constitute a crime. For example, it can be perfectly legal to buy a cop a cup of coffee but not if you’re trying to bribe them.

1 replies 1 reposts 5 likes


Daniel Roberts's avatar Daniel Roberts @drobertsimg.bsky.social
[ View ]

Without looking at mens rea, you’re effectively presuming an innocent intent for any action, and virtually nothing in criminal law has strict liability (ie liability irrespective of intent). The only thing that jumps to mind are status crimes, like illegal immigration.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes