|
Faine Greenwood@faineg.bsky.social |
Yes. Expanding the courts is absolutely the most civil response to this, among a slate of other possible responses.
7 replies 37 reposts 185 likes
|
Michael Maris
@edrobot.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I’m skeptical that they’ll do it, though.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@nusaybah.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Can Biden do that by executive order? Genuine question. Because he doesn’t seem to have what he needs in Congress.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@trebonar.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s never going to get done. What you’re basically saying is that “unless we start squaring the circle, we’re all going to die.” To expand the court you need to end the filibuster, which is never going to happen if one or two dems oppose it. And the game is rigged against the dems on every metric.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Mike - Towards a Metric America!
@navigatorbr.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Ice cold take: All six justices should be removed from the bench. This entire fucking country's premises is "No king" and these fucks said "Actually no, kings are cool." Unqualified is to light of a word.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
WAP
@wetasspword.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It was when it was suggested before all this. Biden and the democrats don't represent you
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Haere
@haere.bsky.social
[ View ] |
ruling sounds like it's now legal for the biden admin to reorganize the court more directly, tbh
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
The Chillennial
@thechillennial.bsky.social
[ View ] |
those other responses are becoming more plausible, though.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes