|
shy hulud@fauxpar.se |
…but would this ruling now mean that no order given by the president can by definition be illegal? thus removing this protection?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
shy hulud@fauxpar.se |
…but would this ruling now mean that no order given by the president can by definition be illegal? thus removing this protection?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Lyndon Hood
@lyndonhood.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think 'proscribed by law but not prosecutable' could be a category in jurisprudence if not practical law But this case it's that it's illegal to obey rather than to order At least, so far
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes