|
John Bull@garius.bsky.social |
No, they brought in the 100 MPs thing PRECISELY because too many wingnuts kept ending up on the ballot, leading to too much uncertainty.
4 replies 1 reposts 20 likes
|
Ian Fletcher
@stupidityvortex.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If they can't let wingnuts on the ballot either then they won't be able to nominate *anybody*
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Stephen Cox Author only more so
@stephencoxauthor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Not so much the 1922 committee as the 122 committee.
0 replies 0 reposts 12 likes
|
David Matthewman
@djm4.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh. Oh! That's very funny, I missed that.
1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
|
@kilbswc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
“Too many wingnuts” basically *is* the Conservative Party.
1 replies 0 reposts 9 likes