|
Gabriel S. Jacobs@gsjphd.bsky.social |
I really don't care that you spotted an obvious problem with a different paper. You think the author of the paper we're discussing should have introduced an obvious problem into the analysis, you missed the obvious problem in the paper you cited against it, and you see nothing wrong with this.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Puͣkiͧte̍
@pukite.com
[ View ] |
My citing the Kolvankar paper is significant because other researchers have relied on it. This book on earthquake precursors spends >4 pages on Kolvankar's results
link.springer.com/content/pdf/...
By the same token, Hough claiming "NO" may have prevented some curious student from doing research
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes