|
semiotics of film grain@jamiroqueer.bsky.social |
side anecdote: I gave this movie a generous shot specifically because of Henry Rollins' IFC Channel show, where he reviewed this and was all "bah" and "Hollywood" and "soulless" and then sat there pretending he liked Michael Madsen's poetry, as big a phony as anyone
1 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
|
semiotics of film grain
@jamiroqueer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
when I do or don’t like this movie, I’m realizing, it’s because of how much it bugs me that it has a visual style I don’t care about. It looks like a manual for correct lenses and exposure while employing the rule of thirds. This is too bad, after two movies with imagery to remember
1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes