|
Prof. Kevin J. Kircher@kevinjkircher.com |
Carbon intensity is not a great metric - physics cares about absolute emissions, not intensity - but even by this metric big tech is doing pretty badly.
3 replies 3 reposts 13 likes
|
Prof. Kevin J. Kircher@kevinjkircher.com |
Carbon intensity is not a great metric - physics cares about absolute emissions, not intensity - but even by this metric big tech is doing pretty badly.
3 replies 3 reposts 13 likes
|
Robert Ferry
@robertferry.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s a great metric if what you are measuring is decarbonization progress within a company or industry—the metric important to policy. Of course climate and physics doesn’t really care about that like you rightly point out.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Ketan Joshi
@ketanjoshi.co
[ View ] |
Yah it's remarkable that even by the most cheatiest metric in the toolbox for ESG reports, Google and Microsoft are flying at full speed in the wrong direction
1 replies 3 reposts 13 likes
|
Robert Lepage, PhD., P.Eng.
@climesgroup.ca
[ View ] |
Carbon intensity is useful for those who like "line go up/down" types, but the reality is that it needs to become ~negative~ before we are where we need to be.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes