Prof. Kevin J. Kircher's avatar

Prof. Kevin J. Kircher

@kevinjkircher.com

Carbon intensity is not a great metric - physics cares about absolute emissions, not intensity - but even by this metric big tech is doing pretty badly.

3 replies 3 reposts 13 likes


Robert Ferry's avatar Robert Ferry @robertferry.bsky.social
[ View ]

It’s a great metric if what you are measuring is decarbonization progress within a company or industry—the metric important to policy. Of course climate and physics doesn’t really care about that like you rightly point out.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Ketan Joshi's avatar Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co
[ View ]

Yah it's remarkable that even by the most cheatiest metric in the toolbox for ESG reports, Google and Microsoft are flying at full speed in the wrong direction

1 replies 3 reposts 13 likes


Robert Lepage, PhD., P.Eng.'s avatar Robert Lepage, PhD., P.Eng. @climesgroup.ca
[ View ]

Carbon intensity is useful for those who like "line go up/down" types, but the reality is that it needs to become ~negative~ before we are where we need to be.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes