|
MI-Forest@maiee.bsky.social |
The ruling said a president has immunity for *official* actions as president, not *personal* - trump is therefore NOT protected for the actions he took on Jan 6th because those were the ANTITHESIS of his presidential duties and purely personally motivated to stay in power!
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Holly Brewer
@earlymodjustice.bsky.social
[ View ] |
In principle it might still be possible to proceed. But there are a few other parts of the ruling that act as additional procedural bars . One is that official acts are very broadly conceived. Another is that evidence related to them connot be used in the prosecution related to unofficial acts, etc
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes