|
Paul Gowder@paulgowder.bsky.social |
I'm going to atom bomb spring conlaw. seriously considering going full anticanon and having the syllabus start with johnson v. mcintosh, prigg, dred scott, plessy, the chinese exclusion case, lochner, and korematsu, and then jumping straight from there to the roberts court's last 3 terms
6 replies 15 reposts 93 likes
|
David Sugerman
@davidsug.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s definitely time to radically revise law curriculum. I’m going back to the crits of the 1980’s. They were viewed as radical revisionists in the day. Truth is that they didn’t see how bad it could get.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Rich Puchalsky ⚑
@richpuchalsky.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Schenck v. United States and its follwup with Debs please, with full attention to how "can't shout fire in a crowded theatre" is still a popular saying for "can imprison someone for advocating against the draft".
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Aaron Sofaer 🏳️⚧️
@aaronsofaer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This seems unambiguously correct.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Dave Karpf
@davekarpf.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Patent Buddy
@patentbuddy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Good idea. Hopefully you will still have a conlaw class next spring.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Jamie Baker Roskie
@whenisayj.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Do it.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes