|
Pat Sobkowski@pjsobkowski.bsky.social |
While overruling Chevron is far from “less radical”, I think my main point still stands: the Roberts Court gets to sit back and let lower courts and lawyers fight about what replaces Chevron. Then they can step in and say “no no, this isn’t right.” A power grab.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
|
Pat Sobkowski
@pjsobkowski.bsky.social
[ View ] |
One last thought: I don’t think anyone knows what will replace Chevron. What I’ll say is that government cannot work without some form of deference to agency interpretation. Will that look like Skidmore? Maybe. Something else? Possibly. 1/2
2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes