|
Robert Reich@rbreich.bsky.social |
Your periodic reminder that Medicare For All would save $450 billion in health care costs and 68,000 lives per year.
14 replies 116 reposts 344 likes
|
Robert Reich@rbreich.bsky.social |
Your periodic reminder that Medicare For All would save $450 billion in health care costs and 68,000 lives per year.
14 replies 116 reposts 344 likes
|
Jim Earl
@jimearl.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Someone should tell Joe Biden about that before the election.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Corrigan Nagy
@corrigannagy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
but brandon would veto it. he said so.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Paul Brownjohn
@paulbj.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But - but - BUT that would be SOCIALISM and it would upset some very rich and powerful lobbyists
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Malcolm RF ๐๐ณ๐ฟ
@p-no-nwa.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah. It will cost health care "providers" $450 billion a year.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
๐ณ๏ธโ๐Interrupting_Cow๐ณ๏ธโ๐
@interruptingcow.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But greedy corporations couldn't profit off our suffering. Won't you please think of the CEOs?
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
My Chihuahua has seen things
@bkbirge.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So tired of "But who pays for it?" takes from the folks that live off money printed from nothing.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
joqatana
@joqatana.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I got fired by both my therapists when I went on Medicare. I now have to pay for vision, dental & mental health and rent and insurance and transportation and clothing on $1100 a month. Medicaid covered all of that before I turned 65. Fix that first.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
jp ๐ด๐ปโโ๏ธ
@bikedude.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Itโs an uphill battle when pitted against the for-profit healthcare industry.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Marlene
@live4today.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Argyle
@dlwchico.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Unfortunately those folks that are currently getting that $450 billion a year are fighting it tooth and nail.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Jettye
@jettye.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Better than the current system, I agree. BUT. Not the same as universal health care. Still dealing with paying premiums, copays, coinsurance, gaps in coverage with Medicare. The only advantage to Medicare for All over universal health care is keeping insurance companies in business.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Only Human
@scarlettohara.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Politicians are corrupt in every country, but in the U.S. they're as bad as those in third-world countries: they're bought by all the big companies, whether they're pharmaceutical companies, coal companies ("clean energy" said Trump), the gun lobby, and so on. This is so nauseating.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
NikkSinc ๐
@nikksinc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Ought to be a no-brainer for support from the pro-life lobby
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
DJ Mac
@djmax.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It would save a lot more than that, based on the experience of our peer nations, who have much smaller consumer bases and far fewer resources. To say nothing of the turbo boost in entrepreneurship and productivity weโd experience with the freedom it would allow our citizens and small businesses.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes