|
Robert Ferry@robertferry.bsky.social |
How could Roberts, after reading both dissents, stay committed to the faulty logic of the majority? I can understand Thomas and Alito of course, but Sotomayor’s and Jackson’s arguments are so crystal clear. How were they not persuasive to the middle? I’m baffled.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Nicole KayWhy
@calipanthergrl.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The majority is still a majority without Roberts. So, imo, he chooses to follow the crowd and nuke his legacy rather than give the appearance he can't control the court (as would be the case if he were always joining the dissenting justices)
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes