|
The Washington Post@washingtonpost.com |
In recent rulings, the Supreme Court added obstacles to the government’s ability to regulate air pollution, water pollution and the greenhouse gases that are heating Earth. The decisions could empower conservative judges throughout the country to block even more environmental regulations.
8 replies 19 reposts 49 likes
|
Jeremy
@expelliarmus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's like none of you fucking people have EVER watched a movie.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
SkyIce
@skyice.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You know, if I was to start up a coal fire furnace in my backyard and smoke up the neighborhood every weekend someone would complain and the police would come. Yet if states do it its just tough luck.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
John Forsyth
@jhfhockey.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Mo
@moinqueens.bsky.social
[ View ] |
so much for the social contract? isn't the entire point of citizens allowing themselves to be governed - that the govt protect and provide for the needs of its citizens?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Martin Koenigsberg (MarTMar) (SteelyDab)
@martinkoenigsberg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@cobalisk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I remember early in Biden’s term there was all this pearl clutching about how Biden might ‘pack the court’ to override the conservative majority… Now we know why it was so important to them to prevent that… so SCOTUS could finalize the United States of Oligarchy project started under Reagan
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
pete mimms
@pmimmsy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh dear, you has 2/3 rds of SC judges paid by business who like profit over pollution reduction. Sure its still a democracy over there?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Xona
@xona230.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Peoples quality of life: NO. Profits:YES
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes