|
Charles C Bentley@zeitvox.bsky.social |
My idiot fixation, well since the 90s: the imagination in Kant is a showing of phronesis. Fichte smells this. It's dialectic in the heart of a book that would try to push dialectic in a corner, exchanging - say- giving and taking Hegel picks up, using it as a wormhole to splay out ancient shit anew
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Charles C Bentley
@zeitvox.bsky.social
[ View ] |
i know... i gotta try and write. Obscene though, insofar as it's what shows itself and cannot be said. A riddle then, like Maimonides - where Aristotle and Plato are there but phronesis is like a black hole - present in absence? A harrowing matter.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Charles C Bentley
@zeitvox.bsky.social
[ View ] |
i.e., dialectic as the speculative vibration, die Sache Selbst, as ethical action anterior to concepts & manifold. It looks ugly and fearsome to any limited Gestalt/figure - which of course will be dissolved in mock combat Say, rather than a panpsychism, a panphroneticism. A spacing and timing.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes