: "Did Roberts ever suggest presidential statements were close to “official acts” in Trump v Hawaii? I didn’t understand that part of the new decision (either). The gist of Hawaii seemed clear that any statement by Trump, speaking as a -candidate- for office, sure as heck would not be an official act."

@zfcook.bsky.social

Did Roberts ever suggest presidential statements were close to “official acts” in Trump v Hawaii? I didn’t understand that part of the new decision (either). The gist of Hawaii seemed clear that any statement by Trump, speaking as a -candidate- for office, sure as heck would not be an official act.

Jul 03, 2024 at 01:05 UTC

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes