Aaron Sojourner @aaronsojourner.org

This approach would ignore all but the most important dimension (e.g. lives). It only ranks on that one outcome because it can't value anything more than lives.

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes

Aaron Sojourner @aaronsojourner.org [ View ] Jul 05, 2024 at 23:58 UTC

No amount of quality years or $ or anything else is worth as much as saving a life.

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes

Prof. Kevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com [ View ] Jul 06, 2024 at 00:00 UTC

Maybe I didn't explain it very well. I'd suggest optimizing first for lives, then among the set of lives-optimal pathways, optimize again for health. Repeat for each objective, with the next most important objective breaking ties in the current one. Does that make sense?

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes