|
AkivaMCohen@akivamcohen.bsky.social |
Not "not illegal" just "not prosecutable"
3 replies 1 reposts 41 likes
|
Pwnallthethings
@pwnallthethings.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Right. The president might come up with unlawful orders, but would not suffer criminal liability for issuing them
3 replies 1 reposts 33 likes
|
Avishay Ben-Sasson-Gordis
@avishaybsg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
For him. And for them? He can order them to do it with impunity and they have to do what? Refuse and be replaced?
4 replies 0 reposts 8 likes
|
Nicholas Grossman
@nicholasgrossman.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The difference between "there cannot be legal consequences for this" and "this is not illegal" is semantic. They function the same.
3 replies 0 reposts 15 likes