|
Amanda Marcotte@amandamarcotte.bsky.social |
Loving the RTs and likes! But please read, as well. I lay out why the justices made the definition of "official acts" so vague: So that they can rule it's official if it's a Republican, unofficial if it's a Democrat.
5 replies 14 reposts 51 likes
|
MarkH
@markhoofnagle.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Damn Right!
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Norbizness
@norbizness.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This SCOTUS term (short version): Look, commit crimes all you want, just don't try to regulate emissions.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
|
Pvnk'd
@cynickal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Definitely worth reading. Also this is my surprised face. 😐
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Eric Gilliland
@epatrick909.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So, on Trump's first day he could just declare the Constitution void and have his people draw up a new one? Order military strikes on blue states? Have the entire democratic caucus thrown in prison? End citizenship for all declared Democrats? I have no idea how far this could go.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Douglas Moran
@dougom.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Do you think *Biden* should try to use these newly-established powers?
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes