|
Ari Cohn@aricohn.com |
For a guy who thinks the Court shouldn't legislate, Thomas sure is keen on re-writing Section 230.
Congress chose to protect online services from liability for user content. That's entirely separate from, and immaterial to, the expressiveness of their choices.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
1 replies 7 reposts 37 likes
|
|
Ari Cohn
@aricohn.com
[ View ] |
The entire reason for Section 230 is because content hosted by the platform could be deemed expressive--otherwise why would you need to protect services from being treated as the *publisher* of user-generated content?
1 replies 2 reposts 25 likes