|
Astronomer Royal for Scotland | Catherine Heymans@astroroyalscot.bsky.social |
🙏Anke! On theft, I see a distinction between AI for creative content(art, stories etc - a hard no) and AI for software. In programming there is a strong tradition of open access & sharing - using AI to parse the back catalogue seems a natural evolution to the process?
3 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
James Carrier
@studiousbadger.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Such sharing requires consent on the part of the original authors, and frequently comes with some form of obligation to share forward within very specific constraints (FOSS/GNU, BSD etc). I'm not seeing much in the way of consent or concern with licensing? Quite the opposite.
2 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
|
Astronomer Royal for Scotland | Catherine Heymans
@astroroyalscot.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Also 🙏for the Forbes link. What I can't immediately assess is whether the efficiencies of running a faster less energy-intensive AI-improved piece of software outweighs the energy used for the AI query in the first place 🤔. This definitely needs more thought though so thanks for raising it!
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Dr Anke Marsh
@ankemarsh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Hello! AI has to be trained on something. How that something - the dataset(s) are obtained is a problem. Much is stolen, ie scraped from the internet. Other orgs are using proprietary datasets, are open/transparent/sharing and that’s good. But they are in the minority & this issue has to be resolved
2 replies 0 reposts 3 likes