Jeff Crank's avatar

Jeff Crank

@cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com

3031 followers 237 following 2804 posts

Editor-in-Chief, Baseball Prospectus | I make the negativity come alive.


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

He's on the IL in my heart

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

unfair, gavin stone is the healthiest starter

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

and if you wanna separate it from the clip that inspired the commentary and just say there is too much jargon-y talk from analysts on TV, I think that's *also* fine, but a failing on the analyst to translate into why it's meaningful, not a fault of the jargon in and of itself

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

It's fine to knock jargon for jargon's sake, and I hear his point on "does this translate to him being a good quarterback or not" but THAT is for the analysts/talking heads who piggyback the video to get into, right? It's literally Hard Knocks, why wouldn't they show this shit.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

it's not even a good equivalent example because this complaint is about a QB being a *film nerd*, i.e. someone who breaks down tape and can dissect what is happening on it.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

Hard Knocks? There's not really a baseball equivalent although I think they're working on one w/apple or something. Basically it would be like complaining about networks fetishizing analytics jargon after a show about what FOs operate like shows personnel using analytics jargon to do their job.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

and to make this complaint off the back of an episode of Hard Knocks, which purports to show what things are like inside the locker room, etc...that's *really* weird/mistargeted.

1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

really bizarre take from a guy who usually has good ones. IF networks are fetishizing jargon, that's damning of the producers/networks, not film analysis itself. The point of people being able to speak that language is that they can translate it to the audience.

2 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Reposted by Jeff Crank

Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

good stuff from Ginny on a fascinating potential trade piece. Bad first two months but he's righted the ship and is going to be expensive, something TB has an allergy to. Seller's market could mean more traction than normal to this type of trade.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

finding out there was an x-chair with a built in fan (and heater, but I would never use the heater) like a month after purchasing an x-chair (and I hope to never purchase another chair ever again) was really rough on the ol' mental state

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

the misspelling that's further down that page (or maybe on one of the other pages like that) absolutely kills me. I hate it!

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

it's not quite what's happening at The Classical but there are some similarities and it sucks out loud!

2 replies 1 reposts 6 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

100%. I almost added on before about how they said "twitter will be our public editor" and then immediately set about pissing off twitter as much as possible. Infuriating is exactly the word.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

right and like they're gonna do some bullshit like "we reported on the log and that reporting was accurate" but when they had Sullivan as PE, there would have been someone saying "obviously this implied XYZ and that was irresponsible, etc. etc." And it really just eats me up that that's gone!

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

really really bad! and it's just...gonna stay up there and no one will address it (from the Times, I mean), or cop to it being a fuck up or anything!

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

"here's the process, here's what happened, here's what needed to happen and what will be the process going forward." Instead we got the Reader Center.

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

and look...that's always gonna happen. but having SOME measure of internal accountability for the many many many many choices being made over there...man. and honestly rn I'm thinking about the visitor log/parkinson dr story, because holy fuck...shouldn't *someone* follow up on that?

3 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

sometimes it is just to imagine what Liz Spayd would say and make myself angry but still...I am thinking about it

0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

usually when people say they "think a lot about ______." I am pretty doubtful, but here I am posting "I think a LOT about the NYT (and WaPo) getting rid of the public editor these days." and I really do.

2 replies 0 reposts 15 likes


Reposted by Jeff Crank

Reposted by Jeff Crank

Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

reading James Inhofe's obituary and feeling inspired to think about other people who could die, too

1 replies 8 reposts 67 likes


Reposted by Jeff Crank

Sen. Gogurt taking notes on a criminal conspiracy's avatar Sen. Gogurt taking notes on a criminal conspiracy @ugarles.bsky.social
[ View ]

Funny that according to NYT Biden could "focus attention on Trump's mendacity" by dropping out but NYT can't independently make it the evergreen top story when it is obviously the bigger deal. Especially if they are going to concede that Trump also has all of the flaws Biden is getting tagged with.

5 replies 29 reposts 167 likes


Reposted by Jeff Crank

Tom Scocca's avatar Tom Scocca @tomscocca.bsky.social
[ View ]

They can say all they want about how they cover both candidates' flaws with equal professional scrutiny but they transparently believe the Democratic nomination is something they have the power to influence and the Republican nomination is something they don't

7 replies 66 reposts 312 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

(also just tbc "qualifications" meaning statements about how they wouldn't make an actual diagnosis from afar, etc., not qualifications as though they are qualified to do so. Sorry about that)

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

as for what the NYT opts to cover, it's an entirely different issue than the subject I was replying on, which was pretty narrow. I am not a fan of the way they've conducted their coverage, tbc, and I don't subscribe for a reason.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

without endorsing the piece (bc I don't, really, but it had relevant statements from doctors who know what the disease (and its brethren) look like) there are a number of qualifications from the people quoted. As said elsewhere, I trust OP to be able to discern what is relevant within the article.

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

that's not really a problem with what I'm saying. OP asked if people knew what Parkinsons looked like. That's all I was addressing. Nowhere did I claim that those symptoms are specific to Parkinsons.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

yeah the thing I didn't mention i/r/t their rep with being able to do that is that Tampa and Cleveland are the prior teams here. Not that anyone is infallible, but you gotta think he's gotten a fair bit of good advice in terms of development between those orgs, too

1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

for sure, and like I said, I'm with you on that stuff. I had just seen other speculation (outside of the debate stuff, etc.) and figured I'd mention. But I agree.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

I actually think Myers is fairly legit as like a 3.5-3.8 ERA type? Again, it helps playing in front of that defense, but he's a functional back-end starter imo.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

yeah, exactly. the baseline is so low, and the low-hanging fruit on the upgrade from the defense is there, too. Maybe he keeps giving up HRs but more of them are solos. That's fine given Milwaukee's very credible offense.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

again, it wasn't an endorsement of conclusions, but he does name specific sources and what they said (and I've not really seen disagreement on what symptoms those ailments have when I did cursory research). I trust OP to be able to discern between the rest.

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

I didn't really get into it specifically, but you're right of course. I just think that is what it is (and will be affected somewhat by pitch mix alterations, which I did discuss). I don't think it was a huge acquisition other than meaning fewer starts for guys like Keuchel, etc.

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

yah, tbc, I was not trying to pass judgement/endorse the article itself, but when I read it, it seemed they did indeed talk to specialists in/around the field about what parkinsonism looks like. I wasn't trying to offer it as a rebuttal, just something I'd seen that addressed the question.

3 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Reposted by Jeff Crank

Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

I'm aware. I was addressing the particular part of the post about what it looks like.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jeff Crank's avatar Jeff Crank @cdgoldstein.baseballprospectus.com
[ View ]

I'm very much with you on this stuff, for the record, but I did see this the other day re: what "Parkinsonism" looks like.

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes