|
Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social |
It’s not good, folks!
I’ll have more at Law Dork, but first, you can catch me at noon on NewsHour and at 1:25p on the Georgetown Law SCOTUS Term in Review panel.
Thanks for following along these many mornings. Subscribe to Law Dork if you haven’t yet! www.lawdork.com
2 replies 6 reposts 49 likes
|
DrCrlsnPE
@drcrlsnpe.bsky.social
[ View ] |
How compares to Judge Chutkan's ruling re immunity? Didn't she address "official acts"?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Lily
@libablue.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"the parties and the District Court must ensure that sufficient allegations support the indictment’s charges without such conduct (= conduct that has immunity). Testimony or private records of the President or his advisers probing such conduct may not be admitted as evidence at trial.”
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes