It’s not good, folks!
I’ll have more at Law Dork, but first, you can catch me at noon on NewsHour and at 1:25p on the Georgetown Law SCOTUS Term in Review panel.
Thanks for following along these many mornings. Subscribe to Law Dork if you haven’t yet! www.lawdork.com
2 replies
6 reposts
45 likes
That's that.
Orders at 9:30a Tuesday.
2 replies
2 reposts
26 likes
That's that.
Orders at 9:30a Tuesday.
2 replies
2 reposts
26 likes
From Sotomayor's dissent:
3 replies
33 reposts
124 likes
From Sotomayor's dissent:
3 replies
33 reposts
124 likes
Thomas concurs to question the constitutionality of the special counsel's appointment.
Barrett concurs in part because she does not join a part of the court's opinion not allowing evidence of any official acts even to be admitted as evidence.
2 replies
2 reposts
41 likes
Thomas concurs to question the constitutionality of the special counsel's appointment.
Barrett concurs in part because she does not join a part of the court's opinion not allowing evidence of any official acts even to be admitted as evidence.
2 replies
2 reposts
41 likes
Sotomayor is reading from her dissent. You cannot hear it because, despite having the capacity to do so, the Supreme Court does not livestream opinion announcements.
1 replies
16 reposts
143 likes
Sotomayor is reading from her dissent. You cannot hear it because, despite having the capacity to do so, the Supreme Court does not livestream opinion announcements.
1 replies
16 reposts
143 likes
As to Trump:
- Absolutely immune from prosecution for DOJ discussions.
- Presumption of immunity for efforts to pressure Pence, but could be rebutted on remand.
- Discussions w state actors and Jan. 6 comments must be determined if they are official or not on remand.
7 replies
36 reposts
111 likes
As to Trump:
- Absolutely immune from prosecution for DOJ discussions.
- Presumption of immunity for efforts to pressure Pence, but could be rebutted on remand.
- Discussions w state actors and Jan. 6 comments must be determined if they are official or not on remand.
7 replies
36 reposts
111 likes
Roberts has the opinion for the court. Thomas concurs. Barrett concurs in part. Sotomayor dissents for the Democratic appointees. Jackson also writes her own dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
3 replies
13 reposts
70 likes
Roberts has the opinion for the court. Thomas concurs. Barrett concurs in part. Sotomayor dissents for the Democratic appointees. Jackson also writes her own dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
3 replies
13 reposts
70 likes
BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds, 6-3, that a former president is absolutely immune from prosecution for actions within their "conclusive and preclusive" authority and presumptively immune from prosecution for all official acts.
More to come at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com
29 replies
91 reposts
211 likes
Next up: NetChoice, in one decision by Kagan. Neither circuit got it right in the content moderation cases, the 6-3 court rules. The 5th Circuit decision rests on a "serious misunderstanding" of the First Amend. Alito, w Thomas & Gorsuch, dissents. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
2 replies
17 reposts
42 likes
Next up: NetChoice, in one decision by Kagan. Neither circuit got it right in the content moderation cases, the 6-3 court rules. The 5th Circuit decision rests on a "serious misunderstanding" of the First Amend. Alito, w Thomas & Gorsuch, dissents. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
2 replies
17 reposts
42 likes
Jackson is reading from her dissent — meaning all three Democratic appointees have read from their dissent in one of the big administrative law cases decided over the past week, a clear attempt to highlight the importance of these decisions. (Not that SCOTUS lets you hear.)
3 replies
27 reposts
172 likes
Jackson is reading from her dissent — meaning all three Democratic appointees have read from their dissent in one of the big administrative law cases decided over the past week, a clear attempt to highlight the importance of these decisions. (Not that SCOTUS lets you hear.)
3 replies
27 reposts
172 likes
I warned of this on Friday at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com/p/forget-the...
4 replies
41 reposts
113 likes
Jackson urges Congress to "address this absurdity and forestall the coming chaos" in dissent.
4 replies
25 reposts
119 likes
Jackson urges Congress to "address this absurdity and forestall the coming chaos" in dissent.
4 replies
25 reposts
119 likes
First is Corner Post. Barrett has the court's 6-3 ideological decision holding that APA claims accrue from plaintiff's injury, not the date of the final rule — opening up all rules to possible new challenges. Jackson writes the dissent for the liberals. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
4 replies
23 reposts
55 likes
First is Corner Post. Barrett has the court's 6-3 ideological decision holding that APA claims accrue from plaintiff's injury, not the date of the final rule — opening up all rules to possible new challenges. Jackson writes the dissent for the liberals. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
4 replies
23 reposts
55 likes
It is a two-box day at SCOTUS, so we are expecting up to four decisions. There are four cases remaining, including Trump immunity and the APA accrual rule case. The NetChoice cases out of Florida and Texas could come as one or two decisions. Here we go.
5 replies
22 reposts
72 likes
I don’t know if you’re talking about the Supreme Court, or the journalists at SCOTUSblog — which is a private news website not affiliated with the court — but the website folks do great work and I’ve relied on them regularly over the past decade.
0 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
THE greatest compliment. Subscribe now, y'all! www.lawdork.com
4 replies
8 reposts
65 likes
This is the last opinion day of the term. It's the only day we know what's expected. (But, even that isn't certain. They could hold a case over for reargument in the fall.)
1 replies
2 reposts
5 likes
I'm not sure what this means?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This morning, we get the final SCOTUS opinions of the term at 10a. Remaining cases include Trump immunity, the NetChoice cases, and the APA accrual rule case.
Catch me here, at @lawdorknews.bsky.social, on PBS NewsHour at noon, and at Georgetown Law at 1:25p.
Subscribe: www.lawdork.com
4 replies
11 reposts
72 likes
OK, I have opinions, reading, writing, possible TV, and a panel tomorrow. I must sleep. … Night, all, and let us try to be good to one another — and ourselves — this week.
1 replies
0 reposts
43 likes
HERO!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I truly don’t like thinking about it bc it makes me so mad
0 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
john yoo being a law professor — at "liberal" berkeley — tells a person a lot
2 replies
5 reposts
55 likes
If you missed my Law Dork stories on Friday's SCOTUS decisions, I wrote about:
- the end of Chevron and John Roberts: www.lawdork.com/p/forget-the...
- Neil Gorsuch's homelessness opinion: www.lawdork.com/p/supreme-co...
0 replies
4 reposts
23 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
12 replies
469 reposts
2072 likes
For immunity case, here was my Law Dork:
- Video argument preview: www.lawdork.com/p/law-dork-v...
- argument report: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-tru...
0 replies
4 reposts
12 likes
For immunity case, here was my Law Dork:
- Video argument preview: www.lawdork.com/p/law-dork-v...
- argument report: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-tru...
0 replies
4 reposts
12 likes
This is the 15th year I've been in DC during SCOTUS opinion season, sharing my analysis on social media and for various publications.
On Monday, we're expecting the final SCOTUS decisions of the term — including Trump immunity, NetChoice, and APA cases.
Subscribe to Law Dork now: www.lawdork.com
1 replies
8 reposts
33 likes
Exactly. Or, at least, tomorrow.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I was! That’s why I didn’t do the 5K! ☺️
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Running is good. [This is not an ad.]
4 replies
0 reposts
59 likes
Thank you.
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
Amazing. Thank you.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
Reminder that many journalists have been forced to pivot to independent newsletters (including yours truly) and them promoting their work is good and necessary.
4 replies
26 reposts
153 likes
🥳
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Nice!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
🙃
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
THE REST OF YOU ARE LOVELY AND WHY I AM HERE. ☺️
5 replies
5 reposts
155 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
Worth it.
0 replies
4 reposts
18 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
In contrast, my subscription to Chris’ work just renewed for the second year and I didn’t hesitate to pay. There is no one doing what @chrisgeidner.bsky.social as reliably and well as he does.
0 replies
3 reposts
37 likes