|
Gavin Schmidt@climateofgavin.bsky.social |
Still an unlawful order, and so the interrogator would still be liable even if the president had immunity, no?
3 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@eric-the-viking.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Who would probably have to be prosecuted by the DOJ, which the president is in charge of.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Jimmy "Wear a Mask" V
@pal-9000.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Even if the interrogator is criminally liable, the president has pardon powers.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Ham Elliot
@r0wdy.sk33t.expert
[ View ] |
It may be obviously unlawful to the naked eye, but prosecutors won't be able to use the President's intent or communications within executive branch personnel as evidence at trial.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes