|
Douglas Kelso@darkpoole.bsky.social |
An attorney complains that a judge committed misconduct. (Say, failure to recuse when required to do so by law.) The complainant presents evidence of misconduct. It goes before a judicial panel. You assume the judges will automatically reject the complaint, regardless of the evidence presented?
4 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Courtney Milan
@courtneymilan.com
[ View ] |
What part of “empirically” makes you think that I am assuming here?
2 replies 0 reposts 19 likes
|
Evie Corwell | Rather be dead than a link in a chain of tyranny
@eviecorwell.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Do you just think these things haven't happened before? They have, which is why we know for a fact what you're saying here is naïve nonsense.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
T.C. Aurelius
@aurelius.quest
[ View ] |
It's hilarious when people seem to have no idea who they're talking to even when her name is right there.
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Molligru 🏳️⚧️🦄
@blahpers.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Mr. Kelso, if you need a hint, google who you're talking to.
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes