|
Gluten-free Seitan@davidjorgonson.bsky.social |
As far as number of warheads, a couple hundred has generally been considered adequate as deterrent - China had that many for decades, before building up to 400 or so
6 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Chris Taylor
@chrisftaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Chris Taylor
@chrisftaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I dunno I guess in the end no-one's nuking anyone any time soon. I'm more worried about economic warfare, cyber nonsense and the undermining of political processes. I just hope the establishment here has some pride.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Chris Taylor
@chrisftaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Tried to find a sneaky-beaky ex-submariner on here to drag into it. Got an ex-Navy analyst after a few tries but he's not posted for seven months anyway here's hoping @oijcbrown.bsky.social
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Chris Taylor
@chrisftaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And I can't believe the Vanguard subs aren't tailed by US and Russian attack subs anyway :\
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Chris Taylor
@chrisftaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But (from CND)
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Chris Taylor
@chrisftaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So we have four Vanguard subs. 'However, as of the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review, the Royal Navy loads only eight of the missile tubes with the Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles, each armed with up to eight nuclear warheads.' (wikipedia)
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes