Dave Osmond's avatar

Dave Osmond

@davidosmond.bsky.social

274 followers 160 following 221 posts

Wind Engineer Keen on renewables, efficiency, EVs, bikes, the outdoors, running & cycling


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end) bsky.app/profile/davi...

1 replies 1 reposts 5 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from OpenNEM, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (3/4)

1 replies 1 reposts 3 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here is the simulation from weeks 146 to 149. It was 87.6% renewable. (2/4)

1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with 24GW/120GWh of storage (5 hrs at av demand) Results: last week: 93.1% RE last 149 weeks: 98.5% RE (1/4)

1 replies 7 reposts 20 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here is the simulation from weeks 145 to 148. It was 86.9% renewable. (2/4)

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with 24GW/120GWh of storage (5 hrs at av demand) Results: last week: 84.9% RE last 148 weeks: 98.6% RE (1/4)

1 replies 2 reposts 13 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 2 reposts 2 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from OpenNEM, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (4/5)

1 replies 1 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

This was the lowest renewable penetration in my simulation so far with 18.6% of supply from 'other'. The previous worst week was 17.5% set just 4 weeks ago. 'Other' peaked at 9.0 GW this week, virtually the same as in week 145 and the 9.04 GW record set in July 2023 (3/5)

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here is the simulation from weeks 144 to 147. It was 86.2% renewable. (2/5)

1 replies 1 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with 24GW/120GWh of storage (5 hrs at av demand) Results: last week: 81.4% RE last 147 weeks: 98.7% RE (1/5)

1 replies 10 reposts 20 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here you are. Scale factor for wind is definitely not going down fast enough

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Certainly windy the last 2 days, but unfortunately not so much the previous 5 days.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 1 reposts 2 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with 24GW/120GWh of storage (5 hrs at av demand) Results: last week: 91.3% RE last 146 weeks: 98.8% RE (1/3)

3 replies 6 reposts 27 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Just under 9 GW, so not far off the record of just over 9 GW

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 1 reposts 3 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from OpenNEM, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (3/4)

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here is the simulation from weeks 142 to 145. It was 90.0% renewable. (2/4)

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with just 5 hrs of storage (24 GW / 120 GWh) Results: last week: 90.4% RE last 145 weeks: 98.9% RE (1/3)

2 replies 1 reposts 7 likes


Reposted by Dave Osmond

Simon Evans's avatar Simon Evans @drsimevans.bsky.social
[ View ]

EROI latest: "Wind and solar found to have higher energy returns than fossil fuels"

"A key issue in net energy analysis is the omission of…end-use efficiencies…these effects strongly favour the energy returns of wind and solar"

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

1 replies 19 reposts 40 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Wind was performing very poorly in VIC & NSW, but mostly above average in QLD! QLD wind also outperformed in week 138 starting 10 Apr 2024, which had even worse wind than this week. A reminder that the NEM desperately needs more wind in QLD. (5/n)

2 replies 1 reposts 6 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The week contained near record low wind output (50% below average), well below average solar output and the combined total of wind and solar was a record low at 39% below average. The week also had demand 3% above average (4/n)

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

This was the lowest renewable penetration in my simulation by a considerable margin. 17.5% of supply from 'other', compared to the previous worst week of 10.7% starting 28 June 2023. But note that 'other' peaked at 6.8 GW this week, well below the 9 GW record of July 2023 (3/n)

1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/n)

1 replies 1 reposts 7 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with just 5 hrs of storage (24 GW / 120 GWh) Results: last week: 82.5% RE last 144 weeks: 98.9% RE (1/n)

3 replies 12 reposts 41 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here's a couple of scatter plots of weekly rooftop solar Vs wind.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with just 5 hrs of storage (24 GW / 120 GWh) Results: last week: 94.4% RE last 143 weeks: 99.0% RE (1/3)

2 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Fortunately demand was below average (98% of annual average), so the end result of 93.1% RE was much better than the record worst week of 89.2% RE (week 97, demand=107% of annual average) (4/5)

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

This week was the worst week for wind & solar generation in the 142 week history of my simulation, W+S was 63% of the annual average. Previous worst was 67% last month. Both wind & solar had very bad weeks, 62%-67% of annual average (3/5)

2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with just 5 hrs of storage (24 GW / 120 GWh) Results: last week: 93.1% RE last 142 weeks: 99.1% RE (1/4)

2 replies 3 reposts 9 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with just 5 hrs of storage (24 GW / 120 GWh) Results: last week: 100% RE last 141 weeks: 99.1% RE (1/3)

1 replies 2 reposts 4 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Just recently joined LinkedIn. Am yet to post anything. Do you get much engagement? Do you think it's an appropriate location for these weekly simulations or should I just create a website?

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thanks Louis,
Scale factors are shown in this tweet. Solar, esp rooftop solar is on track to reach one'ish in the next 10-20 years. Wind is lagging, held back by transmission & approvals issues, but will improve soon with 4 GW under construction & the CIS auctions.
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Thread: Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with just 5 hrs of storage (24 GW / 120 GWh) Results: last week: 99.7% RE last 140 weeks: 99.1% RE (1/3)

2 replies 2 reposts 7 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

Wise words from Professor Rod Sims.
“If we’re not measuring our emissions properly, how can we deal with them?
Australia should be measuring actual emissions from specific locations and not using averages based on decades-old industry data"
reneweconomy.com.au/simply-astou...

0 replies 2 reposts 5 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

The following thread contains many more details, assumptions & FAQs about my simulation, including what is ‘Other’, estimates of cost ($95/MWh), emissions, required capacity, scale factors, effects of climate change & much more (end)
bsky.app/profile/davi...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Dave Osmond's avatar Dave Osmond @davidosmond.bsky.social
[ View ]

My simulation has used wind, rooftop & utility solar data from opennem.org.au, rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% & 20% respectively over the year. It uses the storage & existing hydro to match demand. If there remains a shortfall then the model supplements generation with ‘Other’ (2/3)

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes