Reposted by Robert Black
0 replies
3 reposts
20 likes
It's not even very difficult!!
0 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
How does "no disagreement on tactics, that's Undermining Morale!" typically work out.....
0 replies
1 reposts
8 likes
Fire his entire campaign staff and also Jeff Zients
1 replies
0 reposts
23 likes
Oh yeah I mean
I will vote for him come hell or high water if he's the nominee
I don't even know that I think he shouldn't be the nominee!
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Okay but like
You can understand that people might be concerned, as an electoral matter, if that's the best claim we can make for our guy?
2 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
Yeah I mean I think I agree with that conditional claim
The question is just whether it's true that he's unfit
It all boils down to that, in both directions
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
That's not my argument. People are citing 1968 to say that having Biden drop out nowwould be a guaranteed disastrous loss; I'm disputing that
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
If the best election strategy is for him to resign as president then not doing it because of this vice presidential vacancy thing would be a terrible mistake
That's my only claim here
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Compromise proposal
Biden has Trump drone striked and then resigns on the spot 😅
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I really really really don't think this particular point should control the decision, I think that would be terrible folly
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Oh yeah absolutely
If Biden really has to be scratched then the ENTIRE PARTY needs to rally around Harris like their very lives depend on it
(Which y'know, they might!)
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
That presumes that his advisors are wrong to be terrified of putting him in front of the cameras, though
In which case, yes absolutely, clean fucking house and go from there
But if they're *not* wrong...
3 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
I mean, Nixon won the tipping point state by 3%, that's still not a landslide, not even by diminished 21st century standards
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Wow, I thought you were just confusing 68 and 72, but no, you were actually calling 1968 a landslide election
Humphrey got 1% less of the vote than Nixon did!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I am going to Sleep No More lol
I seem to do that on all the Momentous News Days now!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Huh?? It was razor thin
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Oh yeah, I don't disagree with that at all (and I didn't take you to be attacking me, no worries)
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
🤷♂️
If Biden if unfit to serve then he's going to lose and we might as well try something else
(I agree it would have been massively preferable if he just hadn't ever run for reelection in the first place)
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I think the question was more, what would satisfy you that he is still fit to serve/fit to run
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This is literally a vice president's job
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I mean
No, that's not what I mean by it, and frankly (while yes of course lots of the stuff the media is obsessing about is just speech trouble, who cares) I do not think there's no suggestion of actual cognitive decline in the reporting
Of course I don't know if that's true! That's my point!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Maybe!
Depends I think on whether he's right to do so, i.e. on the underlying merits of the thing
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I never said otherwise
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It's not really comparable, imo?
Also like
Lyndon Johnson could not have won that election
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Oh yeah it's not the debate at all. It's whether he really has suffered cognitive decline in the last few months such that he's not fit to serve and can't run an effective campaign
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When has it ever been attempted?
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
You don't have to impute good faith to the New York Times to be pretty concerned at this point, I think
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I didn't say it would
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I mean, same, but if the underlying truth is that he's not fit to serve as president right now then he is going to lose the election
Should he? Of course not! But that also doesn't matter
3 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Everybody be losing their goddamn minds waiting for this interview to drop huh
2 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
Yes, for sure
I mean for me it just comes down to
What is the underlying truth of the matter??
2 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
Yeah like
Agree or disagree with him (I honestly don't know which camp I'm in yet!), I'm pretty sure that what's motivating Mark Warner of all people is genuine, honest panic that Biden isn't up to winning this election
He's not someone who like, has axes to grind with Biden
2 replies
0 reposts
21 likes
Ooooh, really?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I mean it's really hard for those of us on the outside to assess the underlying reality, but
Nothing in the "Biden really did decline noticeably in the last couple of months" story strikes me as especially implausible?
3 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Isn't that basically the reporting, that he's declined meaningfully just in the last month or so
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
100% of what the office of the Vice Presidency *is* is the succession
You can't just handwave that part
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Not viable I don't think
If he's not fit to serve (which is the premise of his stepping down as the candidate) then he's also not fit to be the understudy
Also you can't just make him be vice president now, that would have to go through the 25A just like anything else
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Note that for present purposes I'm being agnostic about what optimal strategy actually is
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
"But if someone shoots her then Mike Johnson will be president"
Okay but if suboptimal strategy makes Trump win the election then Trump is president?
2 replies
1 reposts
0 likes
Letting this VP vacancy thing determine our strategy in this moment would be sheer folly imo
3 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
💯 on that
0 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
I think that what the concept of "doing law" means is just very contested
The conservative Justices think they're doing X, and they think that X counts as "doing law"
I disagree with them that X counts as "doing law"
What result?
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Well sure, but I don't see any reason we all can't form our own views about whether the decision he makes is a good one, much as we do for every other decision a president might make
2 replies
1 reposts
4 likes