Imagine the complexity of the X-books, but add onto it the space settings/cultures/politics of Star Trek, and that's pretty much the Legion. And then have allllll of that reset for whatever reason every decade or so.
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Anthony Dean
When I was in college, one of my friends was dating a guy into comics. I told him that the Legion was one of my favorites, and he made a grimace like I'd said that kittens are my favorite snack.
They kinda have a reputation as "overly complicated", between the setting & the retcons/reboots.
1 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
IMO the Legion's best hope is probably spin-off media: kids' graphic novels, animation, etc. Less baggage/preconceptions, can appeal to a crowd besides Wednesday warriors, etc.?
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
While they seem to take stabs at giving them visibility, they're clearly not much of a priority. Why bother when DC can make yet another book set in or tied to Batman/Gotham City?
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
So overall, the Legion's a team of superheroes in an optimistic future distanced from the modern-day DCU (and can't easily crossover), is a spinoff of a character/concept DC's largely ditched, and has had enough reboots to make them less-than-newbie-friendly.
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
The comic "Kyle's Bed & Breakfast" (about a gay B&B) noted the above: several B&B residents are comic fans, but one (who's a Marvel fan) gripes about the Legion A) not relevant (vs the Avengers) and B) too many reboots = too hard to understand and gave up. (The strip's creator's a big Legion fan.)
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
E) The multiple reboots not helping make the Legion new-reader-friendly, and seems to have given them the perception of "too hard to understand" a la Hawkman/Donna Troy.
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
As such, Superboy as a concept seems like it only exists to maintain the trademark, judging from how modern successors Kon-El and Jon Kent are treated, plus Clark-as-Superboy something DC's shied away from like the plague (despite 40 years of books/a decade of "Smallville").
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
D) technically, the Legion's a spinoff of a spinoff: specifically, they're a spinoff of Superboy. Byrne's reboot removing Superboy doesn't seem to have helped them much (despite repeated reboots). Superboy was also meant to be a kid-appeal character, something DC cares zero about re: canonical DCU.
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
C) they're a spin-off of Superman, who (in the Legion's heyday) was DC's top franchise. While Supes is still popular, DC's made clear Batman is their top franchise, and seems to drive DC's general tone. And modern comics' Batman is definitely more "grim"/"cynical"/"nihilistic" than "optimistic."
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
My guesses:
A) they're set in the future, so can't easily participate in the crossover happy norm of modern superhero comics.
B) they're set in an *optimistic* future, which doesn't seem as popular as dystopic futures these days. (Even "Star Trek" doesn't seem as big as it once was?)
2 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
Thinking of yesterday's Legion of Super-Heroes Bluesky discussion/guesses why they aren't as popular these days. (Though they did get an animated series in the aughts/a direct-to-video film a short time ago.)
3 replies
0 reposts
2 likes