|
Dustin Du Cane@dustinducane.bsky.social |
That’s is not ad autoritatem which is an appeal to prior statements by the authority and not asking an expert for the option. Now go away and read Schopenhauer first if you want to argue eristics with lawyers.
2 replies 0 reposts 16 likes
|
Jeff Foster
@grung0r.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Shut up nerd
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Dustin Du Cane
@dustinducane.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Now you don’t need special knowledge to argue and debate but if you’re pulling out a technical term in fancy Latin for a fallacy, learn what it is and isn’t. Consulting an expert isn’t a fallacy in debate or expert witnesses wouldn’t be used in litigation.
1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes