|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I thought I heard 90 minutes and that they weren’t going to cut it. Apparently I heard wrong.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
euler13.bsky.social@euler13.bsky.social |
3 followers 17 following 232 posts
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I thought I heard 90 minutes and that they weren’t going to cut it. Apparently I heard wrong.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Let’s go one step farther, all evidence says it’s not a problem.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
People gravitate to the sensational. Trump being dumb, narcissistic, and criminal is old news.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So he thinks it’s a good idea that Biden could tell someone to shoot him, then pardon the and have complete immunity?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Biden should immediately issue executive orders formalizing policies that ensure an independent DOJ and POTUS compliance with all criminal laws.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I told you numerous times. Institute free markets, price for externalities, implement an efficient tax system and make a direct cash transfer to those impoverished.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Extending the hypothesis, he can send his staff after Supreme Court Justices, issue the Pardon, compensate his conspirators, and then get a new set of justices. That would be really risky because the new set of justices wouldn’t likely consider those actions lawful.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Pardoning and agreeing to contracts is within his conclusive constitutional authority, and motive for the contract and pardon is unquestionable.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The question is whether the act is within his constitutional authority. Sending the military after a US citizen is questionable, but hiring a group of Seals to his staff and having them agree to kill Trump, pardoning them and then compensating them with a defense contract might be bulletproof.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The question is whether you want solutions or you want to bitch? If it’s the latter, continue on. My thesis is a climate change solution that works very quickly, but also raises the cost of everything, and no politician is brave enough to do that. But it works and isn’t just complaining.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Or figure out how to work within the system and help to change the fucked up shit that needs changing. One of us has been successful at their goal the other one won’t be, but continue to waste your time trying to be destructive and you’ll continue to be dissatisfied.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You have very limited experience. I don’t know how old you are, but you’re on a miserable path you may never get off, just because you don’t have an imagination.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That’s the dumbest shit I ever heard in my life. You think I started off poor and won the lottery. Here’s a secret, they don’t care where you came from if you’ve got the talent. I own hundreds of businesses. I have more equity now than I can make in 20 years. I can retire today.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You don’t have a clue. Some of us aren’t dumb propagandists. Some of us have made enough money that we can think about things objectively instead of wanting to burn the world down like you do because you don’t like your job and salary.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Bitch I washed dishes and bussed tables when I was a kid. I don’t own a business I work at a top firm. If I’m a useful tool, who is it for? I’m a free market capitalist that wants Pigouvian taxes. I don’t fit in your boxes. You need to expand your horizons. People exist outside of your assumptions.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You need help on that front. We’ve already discussed some of your weaknesses.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Well I already told you you gave me the biggest laugh I’ve had since I don’t know when. It lasted a few minutes. Thanks again.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
No it’s to educate you. Your welcome.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Why put effort into something someone already did? That’s inefficient.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Did you read the comment??? “Pricing externalities requires state intervention.” All your silly assumptions are wrong and lazy. Do better.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What outcomes am I defending? Quote me.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Sure: www.businessinsider.com/shrinkflatio...
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s fucking embarrassing.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
None voluntarily. The pricing of externalities require government intervention. A Pigouvian tax. It’s hilarious that you think you’ve made a gotcha. But at least you’re asking fairly decent questions.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Here you go again making broad unfounded, irrational assertions. How is it you landed on the premise that “inequalities can only be exacerbated by capitalism?” Walk through that logic.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
All of them LMMFAO! Every resource that has an associated price is treated as finite. That’s why it’s important to price externalities.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
LMMFAO! Can’t deal with their slightest bit of complexity can you?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Well some of us are used to those settings and some of us aren’t. So if you’re trying to make an excuse for tapping out to save face because you’re outmatched I understand.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I guess then it’s bye buddy.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Bro at this point you’re literally zero substance. I can’t even attribute this nonsense to ignorance. You’ve tapped out. You’ve lost every point in the debate and now all you’ve got left is zero substance ad hominem. Bring it. LMMFAO!
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You’d think you have like 1 source to back all these claims about what capitalism is that’s not a propagandistic, clearly incorrect YouTube video with no sourcing.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I guess bye buddy?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Says zero economists.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He you. Buddy. Do you know what you’re typing?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I’m not confused. He conflates capitalism with wealth inequality. That’s not a comparison.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That’s *indignance. Spell check sucks.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But still, can you mute me again?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Impossible. That’s kind of why economics is the study of efficiency. You know making the most out of finite resources. That free MIT class will do wonders for you.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It was better when you muted me.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Also note, I don’t make assertions that aren’t falsifiable.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You’re fucking up badly. You should reserve your indigence for assertions that aren’t falsifiable. That way, you can never be proven wrong. That will improve your ability to fool people as you clearly want to. When you make an assertion about the origin of the word externality, it’s falsifiable.
3 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Someone is going to exploit the system of kindness that you want to appear and it will disappear. Every subsidy results in excessive consumption. Every penalty results in deadweight loss. The answer is efficient prices, accurately priced externalities and direct cash transfers to the impoverished.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Economics was called the dismal science by a racist fuck who was justifying slavery.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You just make shit up don’t you? Go do some research on externalities. JFC.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Well if you have an economics degree, then tell me how you’re going to craft an economic system where people willingly eschew some level of surplus that still maintains economic efficiency?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
priced has really bad predictable results. Efficiency is extremely difficult to maintain with socialism and invariably individuals will come into conflict with decision makers. Anarchy, is great when you’re the guy who can take everything from everyone else without consequence, but sucks otherwise.2
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The real answer is bad things can happen under any system and none of them are inextricably linked with any system (although probabilities of bad things happening are not completely random). They have strengths and weaknesses and actually need to be maintained. Capitalism without externalities/1
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
No I’ve just reduced your position to its logical result. You’re not complaining about economic systems. You’re really just complaining about outcomes. You then attempt to portray a system as if all evils originate from capitalism and things like exploitation, imperialism & Senicide are non-extant.
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What you really want is the ability to control someone else’s surplus. Which is quite simply, a ridiculous notion. What makes. You so special?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@euler13.bsky.social
[ View ] |
operating the burger joint is willing to take a lower return. But just as you seek the additional surplus that the $5 burger provides, the employer is going to seek the cheapest labor. And the financier is going to want the best available return.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes