|
Gautham FC@gauthamrao.bsky.social |
"agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do." ❌ "The Framers anticipated that courts would often confront statutory ambiguities and expected that courts would resolve them by exercising independent legal judgment." ❌ This is a fictional rendering of history.
3 replies 13 reposts 72 likes
|
CJ the Awkward
@awkwardleftycj.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s what happens when you treat history like religion and our founding documents like scripture. You decide what you want to believe and then use whatever tools are at your disposal to justify it.
1 replies 2 reposts 10 likes
|
Micah Haskell-Hoehl
@micahhh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Also, we have been building laws, knowledge, professions, practices, etc., like skyscrapers on sand since the founding. Being expert at shit now is, like, really a whole time consuming deal
1 replies 1 reposts 11 likes
|
Jay Schiavone
@jaytingle.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Not so. Original intent means exactly whatever the justices want. It’s practically in the Constitution.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes