|
Daniel Gilmore@gilmored85.bsky.social |
The reactionary centrism of the NYT is all in on helping to usher in fascism, which they will continue to frame through anodyne euphemisms
7 replies 35 reposts 175 likes
|
Titania Bird, Regina Gladiorum
@titaniabird.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Ah, yes, the clashing views of "Presidents should be untouchable" and "what the fuck is wrong with you!?"
0 replies 1 reposts 4 likes
|
Tackman Babcock
@tackmanbabcock.bsky.social
[ View ] |
When has a news organisation been this earnestly invested in not communicating what the fuck is happening?
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Bjørnar Egede-Nissen 🇨🇦🇳🇴~🇺🇦🇵🇸🍉
@bjornar1.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh dear deity, reactionary centrism ought not to make any sense at all and yet I know exactly what it means...
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Ton Chrysoprase
@tonchrysoprase.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Calling this centrism gives them all too much credit and normalizes extremism. It’s apologia for fascism.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@andrewside.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Operating like the first reporter to break a story in a second trump term won’t be thrown in jail.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@laurasaurus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Some of their political reporters have openly said that they miss the excitement and feelings of importance they had during Trump’s Presidency. I think they’re underestimating how much more the liberal Dem base hates them now compared to 2017-20.
1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Andrew Bucko
@trekologer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Between focusing on Biden’s debate delivery as a means to avoid having to discuss the substance of what they both said and this rampant bothsidesism, the NYT is showing significant disdain for its readers
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes