Reposted by Jahana
It is not that anyone here would be interested at all, he lied, but the #CocteauTwins have just hours ago revamped and updated their YouTube page to finally include all their official videos over the years, in hi-def at that. So. You know. Not that anyone here would be interested as I said.
24 replies
109 reposts
288 likes
At least this project will come with a hard stop date.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I've really been enjoying his stuff lately. One of my favorite new authors of the last decade.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Who has a better chance? Make your case FOR them, rather than assuming Biden is a failure.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Funny, I'd say exactly that about your framing.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
And as far as being an ineffective candidate, why must we ignore all the events he has done, the gaggles, and the meetings we have watched him take with foreign leaders to solely focus on a single evening?
1 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
He has a stutter. He's *never* been an effective communicator? So?
He has been an effective PRESIDENT with that stricture in place, so why are you acting like this makes him unfit for the rigors of the job?
2 replies
0 reposts
13 likes
Given his performance over the last 3.5 years? Yes, he is absolutely up to the rigors of the job. What the fuck is wrong with you?
Why is one evening the sole timeline we are allowed to judge his fitness on?
1 replies
0 reposts
18 likes
Less "only" and more "every". There have been multiple AI case hallucinations in court filings.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Uh, you're the one hypothesizing about how Labour did poorly because they didn't meet pre-election polling levels while having a historic election. You can't have it both ways.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
You cannot make that math work. If Reform wasn't there, Tories gain 1.5 million votes to bring them to 8.3 million. Labour gains 700K, bringing them to 10.4 million.
Which MPs were close enough that Reform splitting this way would flip the seat?
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
And Reform + Tory was down 7.6%, losing 3 million votes from 2019.
Almost like comparing a historic Brexit election to one that had overall turnout down almost 8% is going to see a lot of absolute numbers decrease even while overall share increases.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Ineffectual is the closest he will ever come to having an effect.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
You mean they gauged their chances and determined that avoiding losing to Biden was more important than a longshot chance at beating an incumbent? Shocking!
The 2020 GOP field was similarly missing anyone of substance, because the incumbent has such a dominant advantage.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
They meant nothing? They determined who got the delegates!
And Biden trounced "nothing", and all other options, in every state. So why is your feeling that he shouldn't be the nominee more relevant that the actual votes that say he is?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Win-win!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
It is, but mail is so passe' now. Postal franking is where its at, and that sounds like banking is just a short hop away.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
The only way I see it working is if USPS buys a banking chain and rebrands it, but keeps the institutional knowledge of that industry intact.
I do see that as a serious possibility, though.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
When I could replace you with any of a dozen dudes mansplaining to a woman *in her field of expertise* that I have seen this morning already without changing the tone of this thread one iota, "being male at people" fits you to a T.
Deal with it.
0 replies
0 reposts
21 likes
Nice!
Wordle 1,112 3/6*
โฌโฌโฌโฌ๐จ
๐จ๐จโฌ๐จ๐จ
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Aaaand ... I'm blocked. Thanks muchly. I am seriously trying to get informed about this here.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
I've asked this to multiple people and nobody has managed to answer it: Where?
Where did Gaiman say this? I'm dying for a link to a statement from him, directly, but everything I've seen is either the podcast or another outlet rehashing the podcast. Can you link me to Neil's denial?
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
Sorry, it's even worse. They say that they "... understand that Gaiman believes ...".
How? Who did they talk to? This is journalistic malpractice, at BEST. Note: I'm not disbelieving the allegations, but I want some actual information, and I'm stymied by the slipshod reporting here.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
So I have seen the original podcast source say that Gaiman believes these to be due to false memories, but I haven't seen anything from, y'know, him. Got a link?
Everything I try to research here goes back to a single source that seems unreliable. I'd like to hear from better sources.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Blocking is for everyone, but a bespoke "fuck off" adds that extra something just for you.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Twitter would like a word with you...
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Congrats and commiserations, in that order.
Sent help.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yes, but I'm not paid enough to deal with Oracle licensing, let alone hazard pay for dealing with their SQL spec interpretation.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
SQL searches are case-insensitive, so no, it won't miss them. And yes, I could LTRIM(RTRIM()) the data, but like I said, that's data, not code.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Quelle surprise. Jay did not like to be pushed back against.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
That has been my goto reaction for ChatGPT output for over a year now.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Look, all those spare CPU cycles need to be put to use to improve efficiency.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Jay is a little sensitive.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Experience like "Give me a list of states starting and ending with the same letter" returning facially bad results? That kind of experience?
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Column A list of states, column B is =IF(LEFT(A1,1)=RIGHT(A1,1),A1,"") with the row number matching the row it is in. Any text in column B is a state starting and ending with same letter.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
It's so far off it is sliding into "not even wrong" territory. It is deciding to go from Chicago to NYC by way of Seattle. No professional developer would approach the problem like this!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
@wqsaves.bsky.social code of "states.Where(x => x.First() == x.Last()) is even shorter and handles it in code - and is ALSO semantically equivalent to "show me all the states that start and end with the same letter". No frills. No tortured grammar. Just a correct result.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
You think you can speak for software developers' thinking, but cannot parse "I'd reject the pr"?
Tell me you are not a software developer without saying you're not a software developer.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
The code I posted is the semantic equivalent of "Show me all the states that start and end with the same letter", which is demonstrably wrong in Gemini. Having to massage your prompt into multiple subclauses in English to force a correct result is a *problem*.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
You made a claim about how I would *approach* the problem. And no, I am not going to case the data, I am simply going to use some very short code that checks the first and last letters of a string and returns those that match. So your claim is simply wrong.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Or next week. Saw someone point out that Roberts didn't say tomorrow would be the final day, which means it will not be.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Exactly. Lambdas are almost ubiquitous in 2024. I would be shocked to see anyone from a generation after mine NOT knowing about them, and I'm fucking old.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The hell I would.
It's a list of states. 50 data elements. I'm going to winnow it on the data pull: SELECT * FROM states
WHERE SUBSTRING(state_name,1,1) = SUBSTRING(state_name,len(state_name),1) AND state_name IS NOT NULL.
Any errors I get are going to be in the data, and I'll fix those there.
2 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
In 2024? I'd say yes.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
No, you don't. You just have to know that some words are more likely to follow a particular word than others. That's it.
That is *precisely* how autocomplete works, and autocomplete has no understanding of language nor intelligence. It just plays the odds.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
They didn't say "better", just "different"
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Which is an achievement, given that scurvy *does* poll better.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
No, it really isn't, and your intent to obfuscate the line is noted.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
๐งท
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes