|
James Downie@jamescdownie.bsky.social |
The mocking right-wing profs are just echoing Roberts' opinion, no?
4 replies 0 reposts 18 likes
|
Quinta Jurecic
@qjurecic.bsky.social
[ View ] |
agreed, but none of them, including roberts, actually explain why the hypo is wrong!
8 replies 2 reposts 73 likes
|
Werewolf Bar Kochba
@dickius.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Trump: “I will literally break the law on my first day in office. Pinky Swear!” Balls-and-strikes Roberts: “it’s extremely hypothetical whether any future president might break the law.”
1 replies 2 reposts 2 likes
|
Sagittarius A*
@sagastar.bsky.social
[ View ] |
i guess just ignoring the present where at least two (nixon, trump) have.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Gary in PR
@pr-gary.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's fairly amazing that in the era of Donald Trump, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court thinks that a president who might feel "empowered to violate federal criminal law" is an "extreme hypothetical" He seems intent on sealing his legacy as one of the very worst Chiefs..
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes