Sure. Large number of US conservatives argue for hereditary or cultural inequality of groups they look down on. They argue on principle for policies that imply superiority or inferiority. In default mode, racism denies it is racist and supports itself through allegedly egalitarian principles.
But now many of these people are just dropping democratic pretense all together. So seems like they're letting the contradictions fall away and just embracing it.
Was the American Revolution fought to displace aristocracy or replace aristocracy?
(It was replace for the most part, but never so overtly as with plantation owners.)
There's no basic difference between justification of economic inequality and hereditary claims. The "soft" version is that it is cultural, but not only does that fail empirically, it relies on all the same tropes as biological racism. Explaining why it is OK leaves no other option but racial blame.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
🏳️⚧️ Millennial Horniness is Not a Crime@josie.zone
[ View ]
