|
Jennifer@jennifilm.nz |
- the Review chose to selectively examine the supposed harms of gender affirming care, while ignoring the significant harms of not providing treatment - the Review ignored the views of the trans people it spoke with, who expressed a need for better access to care
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Jennifer
@jennifilm.nz
[ View ] |
- instead it limited care to research settings that do not yet exist - the Review held focus groups with cis people without clarifying their expertise - 32% of these people believe there is "no such thing as a trans child" - Cass' own data shows there is no "exponential" increase in referrals
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes