|
Innocentđź•·Abroad@jjgass.bsky.social |
Samsung's non-payment tactic is loathsome. One thing companies CAN'T do in forced arbitration clauses is adopt rules requiring the cliamant to pay all the costs of the arbitration. By adopting a policy of not paying its share—resulting in dismissal of the arbitration—Samsung is doing exactly that.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Innocentđź•·Abroad
@jjgass.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The consumers had the option of paying Samsung's share. But costs include the arbitrators' fees, which will average tens of thousands of dollars (at least) for each consumer-claimant. Samsung's approach defines bad faith: YOU can't go to court, but Samsung retains the option of court or arbitration.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes