|
John Mashey@johnmashey.bsky.social |
I’d be delighted if there were a standard way to tag references, say: + credible , maybe relied on = neutral, or just mentioned in passing - not credible or outright wrong (I often skim references looking for known awful ones, but that can be misleading if the paper is critiquing them)
2 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
Robin Marwick
@electricland.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Consensus statements and systematic literature reviews usually have a form of this!
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Soviet Entropy
@sovietentropy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This would work great with another system where each sentence is tagged in some way with whether: 1. it is a direct quote of the source 2. it is a paraphrase of the source 3. it is a conclusion reached using the source as evidence 4. it is a conclusion reached from non-source sentences.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes