Kate Shaw's avatar

Kate Shaw

@kateshaw.bsky.social

The more you read yesterday’s immunity decision, the more appalling it gets. My take:

www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/o...

26 replies 261 reposts 968 likes


E's avatar E @fiddledeedum.bsky.social
[ View ]

Wow, I didn't realize New York Times was writing accurate headlines these days.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Benny6Toes's avatar Benny6Toes @benny6toes.bsky.social
[ View ]

I'm glad you mention the pardon power. I feel like that's not getting nearly enough, because while presidential immunity is a problem, the pardon power is what will really make it work.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Charlie's avatar Charlie @surfingjoker.bsky.social
[ View ]

hammerhead

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


SnoreLax.bsky.social's avatar SnoreLax.bsky.social @snorelax.bsky.social
[ View ]

Do we need to abandon a presidency in favor of the less power centric PM model? That sounds like a suggestion, but I have no idea if it could work in the US

2 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


's avatar @chicattack.bsky.social
[ View ]

Yes. I think it's clear that the majority is MUCH more concerned not with what Trump did to retain power after clearly losing an election but with the fact that he has been indicted for it. I doubt this would be their primary concern if a Democrat had done the exact same things.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Sammy's avatar Sammy @samuelfur.bsky.social
[ View ]

The supreme court, 6 of 9 judges who are totally unbiased and not being paid off, ruled in favor of the person representing the party who paid them. I'm SHOCKED, I tell you, SHOCKED!

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Steph Scythes's avatar Steph Scythes @stephscythes.bsky.social
[ View ]

🤬🤬🤬🤬 This sentiment, however, does not seem to be what a large part of his base want to hear, as many have expressed their dismay over his lack of action. l.smartnews.com/p-WSfZ8/5LupIB #SleepyJoe

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Kaitlin Has Had Enough's avatar Kaitlin Has Had Enough @gothamgirlblue.com
[ View ]

📌

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Zz🪐's avatar Zz🪐 @zeebest1.bsky.social
[ View ]

This is the most obvious scheme to set up their seat of governance to support Trump, dictator on day 1

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Flying Pace's avatar Flying Pace @flyingpace.bsky.social
[ View ]

Yes: "It is now clear that [SCOTUS] believes...both courts and presidents stand beyond the reach of the law." But this means their "decision" is really a crime—a tyrannical act demanding intervention. Please call on the current, newly "immune" POTUS to pack the Court now. bsky.app/profile/flyi...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Rainbow Nightmare Productions's avatar Rainbow Nightmare Productions @rainbownightmare.bsky.social
[ View ]

I wonder if they realize this could be used by a Democrat President to their advantage. Republicans need to realize these sort of things could be used by their opponents.

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Political Film Blog's avatar Political Film Blog @jgiambrone.bsky.social
[ View ]

Genocide, slavery, empire, assassinations, Treasonous false flag attacks, biological fucking warfare (#GainofFunction), and NOW----just now, only now----they notice some lawlessness...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


John Carpenter's avatar John Carpenter @jcinhct.bsky.social
[ View ]

Gonna be a lot of clean up on aisle SCOTUS once this clearly Bush vGore- style decision has outlived its necessity for these gremlins

1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Jeepmore77.bsky.social's avatar Jeepmore77.bsky.social @jeepmore77.bsky.social
[ View ]

The worst part about it is that there is no immunity law to base the descicion, Under the same logic Roe v Wade was repealed this court is actually legislating and does it in a contradictory manner.

1 replies 1 reposts 20 likes


's avatar @padreosirin.bsky.social
[ View ]

strike down the ruling once the six “conservative” justices are kicked off or otherwise removed…Seal Team 6 may get some new orders

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Rick does Math and Stuff's avatar Rick does Math and Stuff @mathandstuff.bsky.social
[ View ]

It's literally a criminal act since the purpose is obstruction of justice. The inclusion of an otherwise atopical clause banning evidence is the tell. That has nothing to do with the case they were hearing. It's about killing the guilty verdict in New York. And it's without legal foundation.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


P. Astarte's avatar P. Astarte @pastarte.bsky.social
[ View ]

SCOTUS is now a majority band of criminals, with aboslotely no regard for the law that they are supposed to uphold!! They only answer to one man Trump and could give a shit about the rest of us, aor the Cosntitution! They have just declared Trump our new King!

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Mike the Mad Biologist's avatar Mike the Mad Biologist @mikethemadbiol.bsky.social
[ View ]

📌

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


John Perschino's avatar John Perschino @johnperschino.bsky.social
[ View ]

NYT? lmao Might want to consider freelance.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Paul Driggere 🦋's avatar Paul Driggere 🦋 @writerwithcats.bsky.social
[ View ]

I'm just about sick reading all these opinions foretelliing woe and desolation. Shouldn't we wait on what the argument will be concerning what should be deemed an official act...?

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


SanMarcos 🍉🍒🚤🏭 Meme thief's avatar SanMarcos 🍉🍒🚤🏭 Meme thief @sanmarcos.bsky.social
[ View ]

In the future presidents can simply shape illegal activities to fit the description of an official act. For example, having a political opponent assassinated in order to save democracy. Protecting the country is covered under Article 1, right?

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Patrick Schmidt's avatar Patrick Schmidt @pdwschmidt.bsky.social
[ View ]

Your conclusion, "...a future Trump White House could become the site of a criminal enterprise that would make Richard Nixon’s plumbers unit look like child’s play." ... has a parallel: The corruption of these Justices makes Abe Fortas look squeaky clean.

0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Paul's avatar Paul @cohn17.bsky.social
[ View ]

The idea that the Court is immune from regulation is nowhere in the Constitution. It is time for Congress to use its powers.

1 replies 0 reposts 17 likes


's avatar @garb11437.bsky.social
[ View ]

What do we do at the mouth of change at that terrible mouth wreathed in smoke, fog, and shadow lit with its bewildering neon array. What do we do? By the late Chrissy 🏳️‍🌈😢

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Eileen Clancy's avatar Eileen Clancy @clancyny.bsky.social
[ View ]

"The Supreme Court Creates a Lawless Presidency" by Kate Shaw" Gift link!

1 replies 20 reposts 53 likes


Green Trees's avatar Green Trees @greentrees.bsky.social
[ View ]

I dunno, if Biden will only wield the power he has now been given, we could knock this shit right out.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes