|
Katharine Hayhoe@katharinehayhoe.com |
There was an even bigger difference in the comments received. All on Threads and all but one here were positive, constructive, or neutral (one person was just being a jerk, not a troll). Only 18% on X were positive or neutral. The rest were negative, many highly so.
13 replies 158 reposts 732 likes
|
EMPTYSET / FOR ALL
@emptysetart.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What are the number of comments for each?
2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Chris Abraham
@abraham.su
[ View ] |
Yay! Blue Sky and Threads are intact echochambers, preaching to the choir!
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Tim Just Tim
@timkrauss.bsky.social
[ View ] |
These twitter reactions are bizarre, especially considering how innocuous your original post was. It was rational and calm and not alarmist or emotional at all I don't get how people felt the need to attack or insult you, but I guess it somehow makes sense to those people. Weird.
5 replies 0 reposts 28 likes
|
|
Katharine Hayhoe
@katharinehayhoe.com
[ View ] |
Since I had such a large sample (nearly a hundred), I analyzed X comments by category. 47% said climate wasn't changing, I was lying, ignorant, or not really a scientist 15% said I was in it for the $ 14% were insults Content warning: Please don't read the fine print if you're sensitive.
15 replies 68 reposts 473 likes
|
Gavin Schmidt
@climateofgavin.bsky.social
[ View ] |
My experience too
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Dominique Ramsey π£π
@euqinimodart.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I like having a visual as to why I should stop doing something, like going on Twitter
0 replies 0 reposts 19 likes
|
Wali
@walimeow.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I genuinely wonder how many interactions on X were targeted bots. Given that most bots have names like jeff21319578 Maybe count the frequency of digits in the user @ names of positive and negative responses and do a t test or so π
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
JCJB
@phantanoir.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Twitter is overrun by bots that respond negatively to any mention of climate change or race so this isnβt surprising.
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Christopher Rozoff
@agitatedcu.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I am disheartened that many, if not all, EDU and GOV accounts remain on X and not here where many of the scientists hang out. It's good to not be in a bubble and to engage all audiences, but the world on X seems so toxic at this point that it is arguably an even worse type of bubble.
0 replies 3 reposts 31 likes
|
Jared, unpopular Emo π€π¦ - ππΆοΈπβπΏβπΌπ³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈ
@j4r3dhylt0n.bsky.social
[ View ] |
X is a cesspool
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
JZS
@jzsamm.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thank you for sharing this. Fascinating- and incredibly depressing.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Loek van Kooten, MA
@loekalization.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is true. You only get response on Twitter if you say something that agitates people. In all other cases, it won't even be shown on people's screens.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
clΓ€rk
@oksettledown.bsky.social
[ View ] |
how did you calculate sentiment?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes