|
Kev@keviniswriting.bsky.social |
Weren’t all his crimes in this case prior to the election?
4 replies 0 reposts 8 likes
|
Joe Stoner
@joestoner.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The payments and invoices all happened when he was in office, but hopefully it’ll be very obviously not part of his duties as president to personally sign checks from his own business.
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Andrew S.
@shoutingboy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think the issue is per yesterday’s decision, you can’t use “core presidential acts” even as evidence of other crimes. So there will be briefs on whether any evidence based on Trump’s actions post-2017 fits into that category.
0 replies 0 reposts 11 likes
|
Ben Wheeler
@bentwhee.bsky.social
[ View ] |
No. The records were falsified in 2017. It would be hard to argue that any evidence submitted was part of his official acts as president, though.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Chair of the Sewer Maintenance Board
@sidewalkslam.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Some of the evidence came from when he was in office. Those actions are now the Unquestionable Godly Acts of Herr President according to King Roberts so there's a real question of whether that evidence being thrown out would throw the whole case out.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes