|
Larry Glickman@larryglickman.bsky.social |
Giving credence to the idea that DOJ is driven by “Trump derangement syndrome” is bizarre. The feds have bent over backwards to give Trump every benefit of the doubt. To hold that Trump, of all people, needs special protection from unfair prosecution is to imbibe his hollow claims of victimization.
4 replies 7 reposts 23 likes
|
narcogen
@rampancy.net
[ View ] |
The idea that Roberts can’t be helping Trump because Trump has criticized him is laughable; almost as much as the sad realization that Trump is negging the SC and it worked.
0 replies 3 reposts 9 likes
|
Bénédicte C
@benecal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The fact that "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is a term that conservatives use in all seriousness is disturbing. Trump incited an insurrection, tried to block a legitimate election, paid bribes to silence lovers, threatened election officials, raped women. Trump is the one w a pathological "syndrome".
0 replies 1 reposts 6 likes
|
Tom Keck
@tmksyracuse.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Sure, but the claim is that the justices in the Court's conservative majority _see themselves_ as trying to save the country from other institutions' illegitimate actions. As with Bush v. Gore, I think the claim captures at least a key part of the conservative justices' motivations
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
The Long Memory
@thelongmemory.bsky.social
[ View ] |
A whole lot of people in our elite media who 1000% ought to know better are outbidding one another in an auction on credulity for fascist propaganda. I give this 1 1/2 yikes. 😬
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes