|
Liz Darvill@lizdarvill.bsky.social |
They're so blatant I'm astonished they didn't finagle *But only applies to Trump* clause in there
2 replies 0 reposts 8 likes
|
Liz Darvill@lizdarvill.bsky.social |
They're so blatant I'm astonished they didn't finagle *But only applies to Trump* clause in there
2 replies 0 reposts 8 likes
|
Jerry Timber
@jerrytimber.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It was an opinion on Trump vs The United States so it’s not a stretch for this court to make that exact argument in the future.
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
davenow
@davenow.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That part is buried in the ‘official act’ vs ‘unofficial act’ interpretation
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes