|
Mark Joseph Stern@mjsdc.bsky.social |
We have a special package out today called HOW ORIGINALISM ATE THE LAW—about the ways conservative judges wield bogus, ever-shifting historical claims to impose their preferred policies under the guise of judicial review. Just in time for SCOTUS season! slate.com/originalism
4 replies 42 reposts 91 likes
|
Lisa
@oxygenismetal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
📌
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Nick Manos
@manos.lol
[ View ] |
📌
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Alfred N Montestruc
@anmontestruc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Total pile of horsepoop. Progressive leftist judges from the late 19th century on were the ones ignoring plane text and clear meaning of the constitution.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I'll highlight a few pieces: First, here's Dahlia on how originalist judges make up garbage history as they go along, endlessly "refining" the relevant test to ensure that it delivers conservative results. Time to stop pretending it's legitimate. slate.com/news-and-pol...
2 replies 6 reposts 30 likes